Some triangles have the same perimeter (in cm) as area (in cm²). For example, the 6-8-10 right-angled triangle:

What properties of the triangle might signal that this sort of alignment of perimeter and area is possible?
One answer I discovered to this question is completely surprising and delightful to me:
If any of the side lengths is 4 cm or less, then the perimiter (in cm) can’t be equal to the area (in cm²).
It seems remarkable that knowing about just one side of the triangle could rule out a property that ostensibly requires all three sides to confirm, but it’s definitely true, because I proved it. Indeed, the proof itself is one of the reasons I love this fact so much.
You may want to attempt to prove it yourself before I show you my proof…
Ok, here’s my proof.
Consider a triangle with side lengths , and in cm. It’s possible to arrange the sides in order of size, so choose the labels so that .
First we work with the perimeter.
That is, the perimieter is strictly greater than .
Now we work with the area. The area of a triangle is half the base times the height. Choose the side with length as the base and let the height be .
The side with length goes from the end of the side with length to the apex of the triangle. If it goes straight upwards, then the height is equal to , but otherwise, the height will necessarily be less than . Either way .

So, when working with the area,
Suppose that at least one of the sides is 4 units or less. Then the shortest side must be 4 cm or less. That is . And so
That is, the area is less than or equal to .
Combining these two facts gives
And so the perimeter is strictly greater than the area. In particular, they can’t be equal.
End of proof! Yay!
There are so many things about this proof that I love. I love that it uses so much inequality reasoning, which I have a particular fondness for. I love that you decide whether the area and perimeter are equal based on comparing them both to a third thing rather than to each other directly. This feels like such a ninja move. I love that the thing you compare them to is just the middle-length side. Indeed, the longest side doesn’t really feature much in the argument, which is surprising. I also love that the 4 appears more-or-less to cancel out in just the right way with the half in the area formula. A different number wouldn’t have worked, so 4 is the perfect one.
I hope you like my little fact and its proof as much as I do.

Leave a Reply